01152013
Every move you make, we’ll be watching you
30,000 drones flying over the United States in the next 20
years is just one of the things Americans have to look forward too as their
government continues to turn their country into a 100% total security state.
Americans have long ago traded their “freedom” for security, so drones over
Kansas should be no real big deal. The US Government and even the local sheriff
are counting on your support, and support you will because you have no choice.
According to the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
within 20 years there will be approximately 30,000 drones flying over the United
States. This month alone the FAA approved the usage of another 348 drones to be
used within the United States.
The latest drone-hungry law enforcement body in the US to
publically declare they will be using drones is the Sherriff’s Department of
Orange County Florida, which has stated it intends to use 2 drones this summer
over the metropolitan Orlando area. LINK 1
Proponents of drone usage are attempting to justify yet
another intrusion into the privacy of Americans and another tool that will strip
away personal freedom and assist in creating a 100%
secure-total-control-hyper-security state, by saying they will be used to catch
illegal immigrants, criminals, and you guessed it terrorists.
The problem here is that most Americans are buying into
these false flag hyped-up arguments based on media-spin and false propaganda
being spread by their own government.
Saying that some poor Mexican (or other illegal) who picks
their tomatoes, lives in a room with seven other illegals during the picking
season only to be deported before he can be paid when the farmer who hired him
turns him in to the Immigration and Naturalization Service because, lo’ and
behold, unbeknownst to him they were illegal, is a threat to America’s national
security, is the most disingenuous xenophobic argument one can possibly imagine.
People conveniently forget that illegal-immigrants are
exploited to no end in the United States and then blamed for every problem under
the sun. They also forget that without them the price for most fruits and
vegetables, for example, would sky-rocket beyond affordability if union-wage
paid hands were sent out to the fields to pick the harvests. But of course for
the US Government it is easy to blame marginalized and vulnerable members of the
population for any problem they wish.
As for criminals, the US for-profit-prison-system is
holding more prisoners than other country on earth and the US also has a larger
percentage of the population in prison than any other country on the planet.
Does a country that can put a person in prison for life for
stealing a Mars bar on three occasions (California’s 3 strikes law) really need
to be able to spy on anyone anytime they want? And that is assuming the drones
will be used for surveillance. The next step will be arming them, again in the
name of security to facilitate arrests and stop criminals.
Does the US law enforcement establishment need to be this
militarized? The answer is no. Do they wish to be? The answer is they absolutely
and without a do.
What about the terrorist claim? Well, to be frank the
entire US terrorist threat is pure hype. Unless of course we take into account
the self-created terrorist threat that has existed since 9-11. However even
after more than a decade of slaughtering supposed “terrorists” their families
and everyone around them, perhaps in the hope of creating real terrorists and
thousands who will seek revenge for the killing of their families, there has yet
to be a real terrorist attack in the United States of America.
So there you go American populace, you have been duped and
the real planners of 9-11 have been rolling over and laughing at you since day
one. Here you were asked to believe that some ex-CIA agent (Osama bin-Laden
a.k.a. Tom Ossman) organized the most precision demolition in the history of
mankind and staged it to look like a terrorist attack using pilotless “drone”
aircraft from a cave in Afghanistan, and you believed it. Then you were asked to
believe that behind every tree and lamp-post there lurked an al-Qaeda terrorist
from the local “cell” that exists in every “hometown” American city, and you
believed that too.
So they stripped you of one right after the other and you
agreed because you felt afraid and terrorized and trusted your government, yet
who in fact was terrorizing you? Your own government and your
government-and-corporate-controlled-mass-media, who have worked hand in hand in
creating the corporate-controlled fascist state you live in today.
So Americans, you have video cameras on every corner, you
have bar codes and computers that record your purchases and upload them to your
“file” when you use your credit card, you have dentists who record and upload
your data to central data-bases, you have AGPS devices with internet
connect-ability that record your every move and can now even determine what
floor you are on, cell phones that can be used remotely to listen and even watch
you through the camera and which can track your every move, you have traffic
cams that record your license number and can ticket you by mail, laser radar
that can record your speed from three miles out, auto-mounted transmitters that
can help track your vehicle no matter where you might be, satellite cams that
can read the title of that paperback you are reading while you try to fall
asleep, cameras that can see through walls, acoustic, microwave and other
weapons that can cook you alive from the inside from a distance, data-bases of
your every move from a doctor’s visit to a late electrical bill, facial
identification software being used in public places, retinal scans, brain
scanning devices that can supposedly pick up the “abnormal” brain activity of a
terrorist, and that is not all. They want to put RFID chips under your skin with
all of your information stored on them that can be activated remotely, they
already have RFID chips used to track consumer goods and cars and even students
(Texas), warrantless wire tapping and surveillance to listen to every word you
say and to watch you whenever they want, you have data bases that record all
your activities on the internet and Carnivore which saves and records every
e-mail and fax you send, there are even tiny micro-chips in your money which
record every bank where that money has been, and then there are the lists: the
black lists, no-fly lists, watch lists, secret police lists which might contain
such information as the fact that you keep a shot gun under the bed in the right
corner, etc. etc., so with all that America what is a drone?
If you were to enter the “secret” DHS or CIA or NSA rooms
where there are huge screens that they use to track and record everything and
anything they want and can bring you up with a few key-strokes and see where you
are and what you have been up to, including what you had for dinner last night,
you would understand that you are no longer free.
I personally don’t feel too bad for Americans, they have
blindly allowed all of this to come about and unfortunately for them it is too
late.
Meanwhile, is Russia we have traffic cams, registration stamps with our addresses, and very competent security services who actually prevent real terrorists from attacking. Without demanding the enslavement of the people.
01072013
Media-bias, Syria and Russia - an Arab spin
Syria and Russia will go to war, the US is not doing enough
to funnel weapons into the area of the Syrian conflict, the US is giving the
Russian Federation assignments, Brahimi and Russia intentionally railroaded
their own peace plan and finally “Washington has always looked for a political
solution… ” These are just some of the false statements that appear in the
world’s press with regard to the Syrian conflict, but having them all in one
place makes one really wonder who is pulling the strings.
What is intentionally being left out by the West in any
debate concerning Syria is the fact that Syria is a sovereign nation and no
matter how much one country might not like the leader of any nation and how
badly the leader’s removal may be desired, it is, for lack of better phraseology
“illegal” to bring about the forceful removal of a leader from the outside and
it is also illegal to extra-judicially execute a head of state.
The continued vilification of Russia due to the position it
has maintained from day one with regards to Syria is so patently transparent and
self-serving that one wonders how dumbed down the writers believe the readership
must be to be buying into it.
A recent article regarding Syria by Abdul Wahab Badrakhan
in Al-Arabiya News reflects the blatant bias against Russia and Syria and the
adage “if you repeat a lie long enough it becomes true”, but what makes the work
in question stand out other than the Fox News style of repeating mindless
talking points, is the fact that it chides the US for not doing enough and
attempts to portray some sort of conspiracy between Russia and the US.
The Western reaction to a recent speech by Bashsar Assad
was also indicative of the policy that the West is maintaining, namely if
something does not fit into their pre-planned scenario, it has to be vilified.
The Clinton State Department either did not actually listen
to Assad’s speech or chose to ignore all of the points made by Assad. The
statement released after Assad’s speech is what we have heard all along: "…
another attempt by the regime to cling to power and does nothing to advance the
Syrian people's goal of a political transition… His initiative is detached from
reality, undermines the efforts of Joint Special Representative Lakhdar Brahimi
…” and of course the ever repeated calls for Assad to step down.
Back to the previous article in question by Mr. Badrakhan
who would appear to be a serious expert on Lebanon and the Arab World, writes
some things that seem at odds with reality and like empty talking points when it
comes to Syria. He states that Russia which has promoted a political solution to
the crisis from the beginning and Lakhdar Brahimi deliberately caused such a
solution to fail. He also says that Russia and the US have some sort of secret
agreement, which might be indicative of the real Arab attitude to the US, which
has long believed the Arab World is supportive of their geopolitical plans for
the entire Arab World.
Here are some more talking points from the article:
“The Americans are clear about their willingness to
dismantle any situation that might drag them later into direct intervention.”
This statement is so patently false as to be laughable for anyone who has even
briefly followed US war policies over the last several decades. The US quite
frankly, does the opposite as it has been doing in Syria, perpetually looking
for a pretext to invade.
“The regime got the message that it’s free to use the
chemical weapons within specified geographical limitations…” There is no
evidence that Assad or anyone in the government has ordered or allowed the use
of any form of chemical weapons whatsoever.
“It seems now that the promises of the U.S. to the Syrian
opposition, that it can count on U.S. financial and armed support… were merely
words.” Amid constant reports of mercenaries and western backed foreign fighters
in Syria this statement seems ridiculous. The writer also takes no issue with
the fact that funding an armed opposition to over-throw a government by force is
not in keeping with internationally accepted norms.
“Washington had always looked for a political solution,
with an ideal scenario consisting of keeping the “acceptable” part of the regime
and the immediate departure of Bashar Al-Assad, as it just cannot deal with
him”, another completely false statement and the unbelievable arrogance in
saying “Assad must go because the US “just cannot deal with him” is stunning.
“… the U.S. commissioned the Russians with the assignment,
so they can deal with their favorable regime.” Apparently the writer believes
that the Russian Federation which is one of the few countries in the world with
a robust and independent foreign policy is another lap-dog for the US.
The writer then continues to demonize Russia for attempting
to mediate a peaceful resolution to the crisis by saying things like: “Moscow
sends an invitation to the opposition coalition to visit the Russian city for
dialogue. What dialogue? With who? How will it be discussed? According to which
agenda and upon which conditions?” Maybe he should answer these questions before
demonizing Russia for attempting to hold talks.
And he says:”…. not offering them more than a chair at the
negotiation table…” We are talking about armed insurgents and terrorist groups
attempting to overthrow a legitimate government by force, they should be
grateful that they are allowed a seat.
“In the imminent days, the regime will battle with Russia,
which supports its reliance on Iran’s and Hezbollah’s experience…” I have no
idea where he got such information but Russia and the “regime” have had and
continue to have a normal relationship.
“And while the opposition was waiting to be supplied with
advanced weapons…” The writer contradicts his own statement made above.
If this is the Arab position then what we can see is that they want more bloodshed and more weapons and money to be flowing into Syria so that the endless cycle of violence continues. If we take into account the Sunni-Alawite animosity then the reason for this is understandable, but to vilify and twist the facts in an already muddled situation, in reality, helps no one.
01062013
Reasons for teen crime in America, or of murderous
teenagers and torturing cops
Cases of violence and horrific acts carried out by youth
who have been influenced by the internet and computer games continues to grow as
the first generation of children “raised by the net” come of age and are able to
turn their virtual playrooms into real and tangible mayhem. Are they to blame?
Or is the society that raised them to blame?
In Russia there was an old saying that said we must protect
and cherish our children because they are the future. This saying is just as
topical today as it was hundreds of years ago but who is responsible for raising
our children?
Of course the immediate family unit is the primary
structure responsible for raising children, and this is more or less true until
the age when the child is given to a state or other educational facility to
begin their education. The family unit carries the responsibility of shaping the
basis for the future adult. This includes moral values, ethical behavior, sexual
orientation, respect for life and fellow humans, and a host of other areas that
the person then bases their world view and future behavior on.
When economic, moral and other factors, in anyway, cause a
disruption in, or the destruction of, the primary family unit this has a
negative effect on the development of the child, and once that damage is done it
is almost impossible to undo it.
When we look at societal models from around the world with
regard to the support of the primary family unit there are many factors which
have to be taken into account, these include economic, educational, religious,
moral guidance, health care and other kinds of support which most often have to
take place at the local level and be easily accessible to the family unit.
The role of the state and the church in many regards has a
huge effect on the preservation and support of the family unit. If overall
society does not support the family unit or does not provide adequate conditions
for it to thrive then there is a qualitative deterioration in the quality of the
guidance provided to the child who is helpless and totally dependent on those
around him or her.
If we look at the US capitalist model and that of states
which seek to emulate the societal norms and conditions prevalent in that
country we see many complete and utter failings and a dysfunctional state and
societal structure unable to properly carry out the task of properly raising
children who enter its citizenry.
One of the most basic needs of all humans, if not arguably
the most basic need, in particular in a capitalist system, is the need for
employment that is able to allow the individual to support him or herself and
support the family unit.
Employment is of utmost importance in other regards as well
in allowing the individual to realize and fulfill their potential and be a
productive and contributing member of the society where he or she finds
themselves and those factors are no less important, but we are focusing on
family.
The failing capitalist system in the US is an example we
will look at since its eventual collapse will have severe consequences around
the world.
Almost any American will agree the “American Dream” is
dead, buried and almost forgotten. That dream of having a home, a family and
rewarding education and employment has long ago become out of reach for the
larger part of society.
The American economy is devastated and will never recover,
it was hi-jacked and gutted by a few who continue to profiteer from an endless
illegal war not even allowing the populace the industrial and manufacturing boon
that may be found in a “war economy” as most of the jobs have been outsourced to
third countries and manufacturing profits stay in the hands of an elite few.
The resulting “natural escalation of capitalism” and move
into fascism, where corporations run the state, has meant that the American
populace and in particular the family unit has been devastated.
The primary necessities of the family unit have become
almost unattainable, these include health care, education, housing,
transportation and even basic sustenance. Under such conditions the first and
foremost societal structure, the family unit, has become unsustainable, leading
to irreparable damage to the children dependent on the family. Factors which
have destroyed the family unit include both parents working, inadequate health
and dental care, poor living conditions, poor life conditions and overall
poverty.
A state run by corporations where even basic healthcare is
the object of corporate profiteering can not be expected to solve any of these
problems, although it is in the power of the state to do so and one might argue
their most important responsibility. We could thus conclude that a healthy state
and societal model can be determined by simply analyzing the health of the
family unit, for as the old Russian saying goes: children are out future.
In the US the breakdown of the family unit has been coupled
with a police state that has cracked down on all marginalized segments of
society including parents, teens and children. In order to compensate for the
societal breakdown caused by its own destructive self-serving policies the US
state is dealing with the problems through the use of force and attempting to
control the populace with an iron-fist.
One of the results of the breakdown of the family unit and
the move to an information based society is the fact that children and teens who
once spent free time doing homework, playing, reading or even watching endless
hours of mind-numbing television are now spending their time on the internet.
With both parents working, less societal support for youth
and advances in technology this dependence on the internet is a logical
transition that has been promoted and allowed to grow despite warning by
educators, psychologists and analysts as to the harm that could be caused to
children.
We are beginning to see the results of such developments.
Since the advent of the internet there has been a qualitative change in the
youth of the world and in their lives. In most cases this has been a change for
the worst.
The fault is not that of the internet but lies in the
destruction of the family unit and the lowering levels of education, lack of
supervision and absence of positive constructive activities for youth. These
factors apply to the US societal model.
If we look at the Japanese model for example, where there
is a concerted societal attempt to keep youth busy in positive productive and
socially acceptable activities we might cite the old adage: idle hands are a
devil’s plaything.
Although I have said the family unit is the most important
factor in raising children, the second most important factor, the societal unit,
can not be ignored. Parents have their role in the early formation and
development of the child but once school starts they are then exposed to the
societal component and this continues for the rest of their lives.
Hence we as members of society teach the children and youth
in society what is acceptable and normal. Any society that does not take that
responsibility seriously does so at its own imminent peril.
In the US this societal factor is largely to blame for the
acute rise in youth crime. This is largely due to the amoral nature of the
signals that yuth receive on a daily basis namely with regard to the continued
glorification of violence, crime, force and sex in the media and in the things
that are marketed for their consumption.
The victims of society are then demonized as the
victimizers when they succumb to hopelessness and an endless diet of violence
and go out and emulate what they see on a daily basis.
Some examples include the autistic youth in Connecticut who
recently gunned down over 20 people was an isolated child who spent most of his
time playing violent computer games.
Recently two teenage girls drugged the parents of one of
them so they could get on the internet after ten pm, tyhey were hence turned
into the police by the very parents who were supposed to protect and care for
them.
Another case has five teens being arrested for attempting
to steal the shoes of a 13-year-old Chicago boy. Five teens attempting to steal
shoes seems like a pretty grim statement on society to me.
Then we have the case of the 18 year-old from Astoria
Oregon who was so influenced by Facebook that he posted the fact that he was
drunk driving as a status update and was arrested. Apparently he thought he was
being cool.
Another poor young man whose life was destroyed by the
glorification and perceived acceptability of guns was an 18 year old who was
evicted by his girlfriend and her new boyfriend and decided to threaten them
with a gun, he is now a felon and will enter the US for profit prison system
before even starting out in life. There are many reasons for teen crime in
America, another is the endless sex and pornography available to youth, a factor
no doubt leading to cases such as a recent home invasion and rape by a
17-year-old boy near Seattle and another in Tulsa. The response by the
authorities only serves to escalate the violence and rather than attempting to
consul and rehabilitate these youth they are turned into criminals and subjected
to more brutality by a merciless system. By cops who torture, arrest parents for
letting kids play outside, attempt to make an example of an honor student
working two jobs, and the list goes on.
Sure some youth may do horrible things, but it is the
responsibility of societal structures that helped to steer them to these deeds
that must also be looked at and reformed and restructured so that such events
are not allowed to happen again. It is also the responsibility of society to
stop allowing the glorification of violence and to demand from those who can
affect change to do so, in a positive direction.
Without our children, we have no future.
01052013
Saudi Arabia joins US in drone war, Obama obfuscates
Although the US has not officially declared war on any
country, this time Yemen, drone attacks are on the rise and in Yemen went from
eight in 2011 to 53 in 2012. The new US policy of prosecuting their “war on
Terror” in now “kill or kill” as it is inconvenient to deal with “combatants” if
they are captured. In Yemen Saudi Arabia has been pulled in and their air-force
is assisting in attacks within Yemen, and now, it is their “problem”.
The latest reports on the global US drone war again raise
the subject to the forefront and more questions as to the legality of the use of
drones.
The Times recently reported that eternal US ally Saudi
Arabia is now assisting the US in “prosecuting an undeclared aerial war against
al-Qaeda in Yemen.” Saudi Arabia is now providing its fighter jets to assist
Washington in perpetuating its illegal covert drone war in the sovereign
territory of Yemen.
The Times quoted a source in the US Intelligence Community
as saying that "some of the so-called drone missions are actually Saudi Air
Force missions". Saudi Arabia has also not officially declared war on Yemen.
According to the Australian the new interventionist war by
the United States in Yemen is connected with the illegality and the “legal
problems” associated with capturing foreign nationals and indefinitely detaining
them in the illegal prison at Guantanamo Bay Cuba.
The Times cites an unnamed US official as saying "There is
no kill or capture anymore. It's kill or kill”, meaning the US policy of
carrying out extra-judicial execution and targeted assassinations, even of US
citizens, is apparently justified by the US Government and Barrack Hussein
Obama, because of the “legal problems” involved in actually allowing their
targets due process and Geneva Convention rights.
The Australian reports that Bruce Riedel, an ex-CIA officer
stated: "There's a part of our policy that goes back to Saudi Arabia. We
outsource this problem of Al-Qaeda in the Arab Peninsula (AQAP) to the Saudis,
make it their roblem. It is their problem."
The reason that al-Qaeda (created by the US to fight the
USSR in Afghanistan) or more particularly AQAP, has gained force in Yemen is due
to the US’ own meddling in the country and the US instigated Arab-Spring. After
the 2011 uprising AQAP seized expansive territories in the south of Yemen.
Underlining once again the illegality of the “War on
Terror” and the highly illegal nature of the US’ extra-judicial execution
program (droning), are continued attempts by Obama and the US Government to
obfuscate and use the tenet of secrecy to successfully avoid responsibility for
the assassinations and murders that they are carrying out.
Many have been up in arms about the US use of drones since
day one yet the fleet has grown from approximately 40 in 2001 to over 7,000
today. Outspoken critics have included the United Nations Special Envoy for
Extrajudicial Killings, the ACLU, Amnesty International, dozens of peace groups
such as Code Pink, law scholars and experts from a plethora of disciplines and
institutions, and a list that is too long to list here, yet Obama and the US
Government have not listened and have instead obfuscated, stone-walled and
re-written laws to justify their criminal conduct.
At the heart of the illegality of the use of drones is the
fact that the combatants, if the targets of an illegal war can be called that,
have no chance to face their accusers or surrender, as they would in a normal
battlefield scenario.
A June 2011 report issued by the Oxford Research Group in
London stated, as did Paul Rogers, an Oxford Research Group consultant and
professor at Bradford University's Peace Studies Department in England, that
"Drone users cannot escape a legal responsibility to expose the human
consequences of their attacks”, which I would argue is exactly what Obama and
the US are doing (escaping responsibility).
In a more recent related ruling United States District
Court Judge Colleen McMahon issued a 75-page ruling declaring that the US
Justice Department does not have a legal obligation to explain the rationale
behind killing Americans with targeted drone strikes. She wrote: "There are
indeed legitimate reasons, historical and legal, to question the legality of
killings unilaterally authorized by the Executive that take place otherwise than
on a 'hot' field of battle".
Her decision was dealing the Obama Administration’s
continued rejection of FOIA requests in particular regarding drone strikes which
assassinated American citizens.
Judge McMahon further stated: "The Alice-in-Wonderland
nature of this pronouncement is not lost on me; but after careful consideration,
I find myself stuck in a paradoxical situation in which I cannot solve a problem
because of contradictory constraints and rules — a veritable Catch-22,” she
writes.
She continued: “I can find no way around the thicket of
laws and precedents that effectively allow the Executive Branch of our
Government to proclaim as perfectly lawful certain actions that seem on their
face incompatible with our Constitution and laws, while keeping the reason for
their conclusion a secret.”
Regardless of whether drones are a “legal” instrument on
the battlefield under the rules of war or whether extra-judicial executions and
daily kill lists being used to carry them out are offenses that demand immediate
international sanctions and prosecution, the US and Barrack Hussein Obama will
continue to use them and expand their drone programs.
We do not have to be enslaved to the idea that we are
helpless as humans to do anything against the US in their drone war. There are
steps that can be taken. For one, and this is a question for scientists to take
up, we can develop the means and the electronic counter-measures to render
drones useless.
What has been lost on many is that simple electronic noise and electromagnetic interference can render a drone useless. All that has to be done is disconnect the electronic link they have with their command centers, if the US will continue to ignore international law and continue to engage in illegal extra-judicial executions. Today it may be a “terrorist” and everyone around him in the middle of nowhere, tomorrow it may be the head of state of an “unfriendly” country.
01042013
Israel supporting al-Qaeda terrorists - Asafari
In a little publicized statement Mohammad Hassan Asafari, a
Member of the Iranian Parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy
Commission, blasted Israel and the United States for supporting and providing
intelligence to terrorists groups who are destroying the countries in the
region. The fact that the West is arming and supporting al-Qaeda terrorists
should be setting off alarms, but sadly no one is listening.
Last Tuesday a Member of the Iranian Parliament's National
Security and Foreign Policy Commission Mohammad Hassan Asafari blasted the West
for supporting terrorists and providing them with training and operational
intelligence support. He stated that such support has turned countries in the
region, such as Syria, into what can be described as war zones, namely the
scenes of military clashes.
Mr. Asafari blames Israel for allowing terrorists to use
the country as a base of operations and for providing them with intelligence
that is being used to launch attacks: "The Zionist regime,” he says, “has become
the largest training base for active terrorists in the Middle-East region and
the footprint of this sinister regime can be easily traced in recent terrorist
operations." With regards to Syria the official stated that al-Qaeda’s presence
in Syria and their terrorist activities there are evidence of their close
relationship to the United States.
Asafari stated that thousands (not hundreds but thousands)
of terrorists with links to al-Qaeda have recently entered Syria from Saudi
Arabia, Libya, Jordan and other countries to wage war against the Syrian
Government. He also states that they are receiving intelligence support from
Israel.
Mr. Asafari’s statements have of course gotten extremely
little if any press attention by the West but they should be setting off alarms.
We know that al-Qaeda was created by the CIA to help them
fight their war against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan that is an open secret.
What should be alarming, especially in light of the events of 9-11, a crime no
one has been punished for yet, is that while continuing to wage an illegitimate
war against “terror” (a methodology) the West continues to fund, support, train,
arm and even provide intelligence to the very al-Qaeda terrorist organization,
and those linked to it, that they claim was responsible for 9-11.
The American people have given up so many of their
liberties and freedoms and have been bankrupted by their government until the
end of time in the fight against terrorists who are lurking behind every light
post, that any hint that what should be rogue elements in their government are
in bed with the very terrorists that apparently want to destroy America, should
be causing the people to take to the streets demanding answers. Will they? Not
possible.
In the name of terror, thanks to al-Qaeda, the US
“security” apparatus is so brutal and ever present that apart from an all out
revolt, the American people are powerless to do anything. In the name of
security the majority of Americans have become slaves to a “government” that was
supposed to be of the people by the people and for the people.
The US Government is no longer there to serve the people,
the people are there to serve the government. Call it fascism, enslavement, a
police state what have you, that is the reality. What can you do about it? In
reality, like I said, nothing. It is too late.
9-11 was the catalyst the Project for a New American
Century needed to crack on down on liberties and launch their endless war of
global domination, there is no way they are going to give up on that now, not
after it has been raging on for more than a decade. If the so-called black
operations community in the US actually trained al-Qaeda terrorists to be able
to carry out the most precision demolition in the history of mankind and have
been funding and cooperating with them ever since, there is nothing any of us
can do.
On January 1st four Saudi and Kuwaiti terrorists were killed on the outskirts of Damascus, and that is just a drop in the pan. The Syrian Regular Army has captured everything from al-Qaeda terrorists to insurgents with British accents, to Turkish high-level officers, to Libyan “freedom-fighters” and everything in between. Even a recent report by the United Nations states that extremists from 29 countries have infiltrated Syria to fight against the Government of Damascus. The fact that the U.S. is using funding and arming al-Qaeda terrorists should also set off alarm bells in Israel because if the US is willing to fund and arm the very same terrorists who supposedly carried out 9-11, what would stop them from stabbing Israel in the back in the pursuit of their military and geopolitical goals?